Rethinking the Hormuz Toll Debate: Can Coastal States Monetize Maritime Security?
EJIL: Talk!
The article explores the potential for coastal states, particularly Iran and Oman, to impose fees on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, raising legal questions under UNCLOS regarding the legality of such charges. It highlights the historical context of maritime regulation in the strait and suggests that the debate may shift from transit tolls to broader issues of who should bear the costs of maintaining safe navigation. The article proposes that the Strait of Hormuz could serve as a practical test for applying UNCLOS Article 43, which addresses the financial responsibilities of states in maintaining maritime services in international straits.
All articles from 4 September 2026. Summaries are AI-generated and may contain errors; the linked article is the authority.